“Skip scanning” is a theft often occurring at self-checkout lanes, where individuals intentionally avoid paying for particular items. This can bypass the scan entirely by concealing products or pretending they’ve already been scanned. Another common tactic is substituting a cheaper item, like a bag of rice, for a more expensive one, such as a steak. This practice results in significant financial losses for retailers and prompts stricter security measures and store policies to stop self-checkout shoplifting.
Since their introduction in the early 2000s, self-checkout devices have become increasingly popular, especially in major retail chains like Walmart, Target, and some pharmacies. Many customers favor self-checkout for its convenience, allowing them to avoid long lines, while retailers see it as an effective way to reduce labor costs. Some people will use these as opportunities to commit self-checkout theft at Walmart or Dollar General self-checkout theft.
As more retail stores adopt self-service machines, the temptation to take shortcuts increases. For instance, some individuals may find it easier to skip scanning an item rather than face the hassle of locating the correct price. Unlike traditional face-to-face transactions, self-checkout stations lack the same level of deterrence. Some customers may avoid it without active staff monitoring or alert systems. Additionally, when the skipped items are low-cost, individuals might justify their actions by assuming the loss is too minor to have serious consequences.
Regardless of a person’s motivation for skip scanning or shoplifting in Florida statute §812.014, explicitly criminalizes the act and outlines clear penalties based on the value of the stolen property:
If the shoplifted property is valued at $100 or less, the individual may be charged with second-degree petit theft. This is considered a misdemeanor violation, punishable by up to 60 days in jail, penalties of up to $500, and possible probation. For property valued between $100 and $750, the charge escalates to first-degree petit theft, which carries a maximum penalty of up to one year in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, and potential probation. These charges may also result in a criminal record, which can have long-lasting ramifications for employment and housing opportunities.
When the value of the shoplifted property increases, the penalties become significantly harsher. For items worth between $750 and $20,000, the offender may be charged with a third-degree felony. This is punishable by up to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $5,000, and long-term consequences, such as losing civil rights, including voting or firearm ownership. Suppose the stolen property is valued between $20,000 and $100,000. In that case, the offense is categorized as a second-degree felony, which holds a penalty of up to 15 years in prison, a fine of $10,000, and additional probation requirements. Theft exceeding $100,000 in value results in a first-degree felony charge, the most serious theft-related offense under Florida law. This charge is punishable by up to 30 years in prison, significant fines, probation, and a permanent criminal record.
In addition to these penalties, people charged with theft may also be required to pay reimbursement to the victim, covering the worth of the stolen property or any damages incurred. Florida courts take theft offenses very seriously, and the consequences can unfold far beyond the initial punishment, affecting future opportunities and personal freedom. Understanding the harshness of these penalties is essential to recognizing the risks and legal repercussions of engaging in acts like skip scanning.
Retail stores and prosecutors are increasingly cracking down on skip scanning, mainly when individuals or groups repeatedly target the same store. In stores like Walmart, which utilize advanced loss prevention technology, security teams can use facial recognition software to review extensive surveillance footage and identify repeat offenders.
When an individual is caught engaging in skip scanning on multiple occasions, they may face lawful arrest for "Scheme to Defraud." According to Fla. Stat. §817.034(3)(d), a Scheme to Defraud involves:
“A systematic, ongoing course of conduct with the intent to defraud one or more persons, or to obtain property through false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or willful misrepresentations.”
Like Grand Theft, the severity of the charge depends on the total value of unpaid merchandise over the dates in question:
Prosecutors may also aggregate the value of multiple incidents to increase the severity of the charge. As retailers continue to enhance theft detection methods, repeat offenders face growing legal risks and consequences.
If an error goes unnoticed at the self-checkout and you leave the store without being stopped by security, there may be no immediate consequences for that particular transaction. Many stores rely on periodic inventory audits to detect discrepancies, so the mistake may go unaddressed unless there’s a noticeable pattern of missing items or repeated errors. However, if the store identifies a recurring issue during its audits, it may conduct a more thorough investigation into the self-checkout process. This could involve reviewing camera footage or other transaction data to pinpoint errors or inconsistencies.
On the other hand, if you notice the mistake while still in the store, it’s always best to notify a staff member immediately. Store employees are usually trained to handle such situations professionally. They may guide you back to the self-checkout station to correct the issue or assist you in scanning the item directly. For mistakes caught before completing your transaction, most self-checkout systems allow you to rescan or add missed items without any hassle. This can often be done quickly and efficiently, minimizing disruption to your shopping trip. Being proactive not only resolves the situation smoothly but also demonstrates honesty, which can prevent complications or misunderstandings in the future. Additionally, addressing errors promptly helps maintain trust between you and the store, ensuring a positive shopping experience for both parties.
In addition to any criminal charge(s) you may face for skip scanning, some retail stores may also pursue civil action against individuals to recover the value of the stolen goods or their replacement cost. This civil action might include demanding restitution or filing a lawsuit to claim damages. Additionally, the store will likely issue a trespass warning, prohibiting you from entering any of their locations for a specific period, ranging from several months to even years, depending on the store’s policies. Repeated violations of this ban could lead to further legal consequences, making the situation even more serious.
While technology certainly favors these stores and prosecutors, several viable defenses to allegations of skip scanning exist. Perhaps the most common defense is a lack of criminal intent. Theft typically requires proof that the person deliberately intended to bypass scanning or avoid paying for the item. Suppose the accused individual can demonstrate that they had no intention to steal, such as by showing evidence of their behavior at the time or providing a reasonable explanation for the alleged incident. In that case, it may successfully negate the element of intent required for a theft charge. Similarly, an individual may be unaware that an item was not scanned correctly, which could be an honest mistake rather than a deliberate act. For example, the individual may have thought the item was checked when it was not, or they may have been distracted by something else, leading to the error.
Another potential defense may arise from technological failure, such as faulty scanning equipment or errors in scanning barcodes. Self-checkout kiosks are not foolproof; a malfunction could result in items being missed inadvertently. Sometimes, barcodes may fail to register due to damage, improper alignment, or software glitches beyond the customer’s control. A skilled defense attorney can argue that such technical issues caused the problem, shifting the responsibility away from the accused. This could also raise broader questions about the reliability of the evidence presented by the prosecution. For example, surveillance footage must be carefully examined to rule out any misinterpretation of events or gaps in the timeline. These defenses, when combined with a thorough investigation, can help provide a fair outcome for individuals accused of skip scanning.
Skip scanning theft, also known as "under-ringing," is taken seriously in Florida and can have significant legal consequences. This theft typically involves intentionally failing to monitor all items at self-checkout or misrepresenting the value of goods to pay less than their actual cost. Depending on the total value of the stolen items, charges can range from misdemeanors to felonies, with penalties including fines, restitution, and even jail time.
If you or someone you know is facing charges for skip scanning theft, seeking advice from an experienced defense attorney is essential. A skilled attorney can clarify the charges, develop a strong defense strategy, and guide you through the legal process to protect your rights and reduce potential penalties.
The Denson Firm specializes in criminal defense for theft-related charges. Our attorneys have extensive knowledge representing clients accused of skip scanning theft and other forms of retail fraud. We understand the complexities of these cases and work to help our clients obtain the best possible outcome. With our knowledge and expertise, we can provide you with the support and guidance necessary to navigate this challenging situation.
Don't hesitate to seek legal counsel if you're facing charges related to theft crimes. Contact The Denson Firm today for a consultation, and let us fight for your rights. Remember, it's always better to be proactive and address issues as soon as possible rather than wait until they escalate into more serious consequences. With our help, you can work toward a fair resolution and move forward with your life. So, it is essential always to be aware of your actions while shopping and to seek legal advice if faced with charges for skip scanning theft. Don't let a simple mistake turn into a significant legal issue. Contact us today!
© 2025 The Denson Firm. All rights reserved.
